After reading carefully Ruggeri, and Guarino wrote in the introduction of the book "Berlusconi, investigation of Mr. TV" ed. Kaos 1994 which I summarize in three points: 1
- Berlusconi try 'to buy from the publisher Editori Riuniti PCI in order to prevent the release of the book. Ruggeri overshadows the same in this mysterious negotiation compromises and agreements between Berlusconi and the leaders of the PCI ..
2 - Berlusconi, skipped the purchase of the publishing house PCI, try 'to buy the silence of Ruggeri and Guarino with offer a blank check .
3 - Berlusconi, due to the opposition of the check blank, dragged in Tribunale tutti coloro che azzardassero a recensire il libro e tra gli altri anche Ruggeri e Guarino. Tutta la vicenda e’ cosi’ finita : il 27-09-1988 Berlusconi rende falsa testimonianza al Tribunale di Verona , sancita dalla sentenza di Venezia in giudicato dal 13-02-1991 (annullata dalla amnistia) e Ruggeri-Guarino totalmente assolti dal reato di diffamazione nel marzo 1993 .
ascoltando attentamente quello che si sono detti Diliberto e la tessera P2 1816 a Matrix del 11-03-06, mi permetto senza alcun dubbio di asserire cio' che ho sintetizzato nel titolo.Ecco il testo della trascrizione tratta dal video che possiedo, about the amnesty of 1990 and the Venice sentence for perjury P2 card issued on 27/9/1988 1816 the Court of Verona.
Transcript of statements by Diliberto:
“Allora voglio dire soltanto che su quella cosa che amabilmente l’on Diliberto ha ricordato su cui intervenne l’amnistia, io dichiarai che non volevo quella amnistia, dichiarai che (interruzione di Mentana) scusi ci fu una vicenda sui giornali eccetera per cui dimostrai per tabulas che non avevo detto il falso e volevo una assoluzione piena per non aver commesso il fatto. Si trattava di una vicenda di una mia dichiarazione da una altra parte su una cosa credo anche di poca importanza ma in cui dimostrai, per tabulas, che io non avevo said those things. Second thing (there are no breaks Diliberto understandable covered by the voice of Berlusconi) no excuse at some point when I guess she does not know on. Diliberto, how many cases and investigations into how an entrepreneur who has put together 56 000 employees who pays, who made every day a group that pays almost three billion lire to the tax authorities, as there are investigations that the Prosecutor
Ammettera’ che un collegio di difensori, magari dica va bene chiudiamo almeno questo processo perche’ non se ne puo’ piu’ visto che gli attacchi che ci arrivano sono cosi’ tanti…
Unica interruzione di Diliberto sovrapposta alla voce di Berlusconi per precisare:
“Scusi questo pero’ nel ’90 presidente, lei non era ancora in politica, quindi non c’era ancora nessuna persecuzione politica, era un normale imprenditore nel ‘90”.
Conclusione della replica Berlusconi:
"This event has its own history, has a story and it 'been clarified to tabulas in a more' accurate '.
start this comment by saying that Diliberto, as well as labor, and the entire printing system, refers to the sentence of Venice, but no mention of the points 1,2,3 above.
Molte volte questa notizia riguardante i finanziamenti della URSS e’ stata data dai canali televisivi, anche in presenza di autorevoli rappresentanti della sinistra : io stesso possiedo documenti video, ne ricordo uno in particolare in cui G. Ferrara ricorda quella amnistia come capo d’accusa nei riguardi della sinistra e l’avv. G. Calvi non fece altro che incassare without replicating the hit as it could, for example, recalling the sentence was annulled by the same amnesty of Venice.
Diliberto, quoting a phrase from the decree of Venice, inform the audience that Mr Berlusconi and 'stained with the crime of perjury but then the offense and' salvation was settled by the same amnesty for the leaders of the PCI.
Diliberto closes then the 'low blow' struck to the 'enemy' by saying that if there 'was one who really used the amnesty of 1990 and these' Berlusconi.
This statement is 'true ' cause the leaders of the PCI in the absence of the 1990 amnesty, would be affected by investigations of the judiciary but then is not 'said could have resulted in indictments and convictions: the results of the investigations and any related processes were discovered by the courts of evidence and documents.
In the case of Berlusconi and the effect of the amnesty 'was very different: it intervened on a sentence had already' become final in which it was written that the accused had "fully realized the objective and subjective of the crime alleged."
Judges of the Court of Appeal of Venice, which can not be labeled as red robes since October 1990 nobody could have predicted that 1816 would have decreased the P2 card in politics a few years later, judging entrepreneur Berlusconi that she had lied about the date of registration with the P2 Lodge, had issued a final ruling at the end of criminal proceedings Berlusconi triggered by the same to intimidate journalists brave and honest. Since
'Mr. Diliberto is not 'so' picky and grind as they call themselves, listeners of transmission, who know nothing of the past that led to the decision of Venice, (always remember the points 1,2,3) low blow dealt by the Berlusconi to capture solo il messaggio che la tessera P2 ogni tanto ha il vizio di mentire, e che l’amnistia del
Questo pressapochismo di Diliberto offre a Berlusconi la possibilita’ di neutralizzare senza troppa fatica il ‘colpo basso’, con danno della corretta informazione del cittadino.
D’altronde e’ con un ritardo di 12 anni che in TV, a notte fonda, mentre ascoltano some hundreds of thousands of people, that is mentioned just a matter of gravity 'extreme. Rereading
especially seeing the video of the replica of Berlusconi will immediately notice how he is in trouble 'in the answer:
Berlusconi babbles, you get flustered, speak half-sentences, lying all the time: in fact the blow would be Diliberto could be fatal. But remember with 12 years behind has lost much of its effectiveness.
Besides this delay of 12 years, as stated in Labor claims that I recorded the 09/02/2006, favors and Berlusconi confirms that not Diliberto really interested in putting their backs to the wall Berlusconi, but rather to convey a message.
half-truths' of Diliberto eventually led to Berlusconi, a lie a lie, and flying on the date, the mixing of the legal case several years prior to disceca in the field, with subsequent judicial proceedings conducted by the Milan prosecutors from the trial for the corruption of the Guardia di Finanza, which began when Berlusconi was down in politics.
Then for Berlusconi 'was easy game to neutralize the low blow, pretending to be the thousandth time victim of political persecution carried out by the togas red ect., ect.,; passed the time of difficulty 'to Berlusconi the gab returns smoothly and fluently without hesitation.
Diliberto mentions a denial, stating that the story to which he referred was the 1990 and therefore well before the descent into political Anointed of the Lord, but then lets go.
E 'clear then that Diliberto not interested in' hurt 'to Berlusconi, but most definitely not interested in making known to listeners the true story of data.
